Federal Water Rights Quantification and the Federal Trust in Indian Country

Ethel Branch, Candace D. French, and John B. Weldon, Jr. 
Since 1978, the federal government has entered into 39 water rights settlements with Indian Tribes based on the Winters doctrine, which asserts that Indian reservations have implicit water rights. This presentation will examine the effects of the 2023 Supreme Court decision in Arizona v. Navajo Nation on these rights and discuss whether it signifies a narrowing of the Winters doctrine or is limited to the case's specifics.
Credit(s)

1

CO Approval ID

849637

Original Program Date

July 18, 2024

Duration

55 minutes

PRICING

Member Price: $65.00
Non-Member Price: $95.00

About this course

The federal government has entered into 39 water rights settlements with Indian Tribes since 1978, the primary issue of which is quantification. The legal basis of the quantification and settlement of these rights is the Winters doctrine. Established by the Supreme Court in 1908, the doctrine recognizes that when Congress reserves land by creating an Indian reservation, it implicitly reserves water sufficient to fulfill the reservation’s purpose. On June 22, 2023, however, the Supreme Court held in Arizona v. Navajo Nation that the U.S. did not have an “affirmative duty” under treaty or its trust obligation to identify and account for Navajo Nation water rights in the Colorado River. This presentation will examine the status of federal water rights quantification, including ongoing litigation and settlements in Indian Country, the law and trust obligations of the federal government toward Tribes relating to water rights, and whether the Navajo Nation case should be regarded as narrowing the Winters doctrine or as limited to the facts of the case.

Video presentation from the 70th Annual Natural Resources and Energy Law Institute.
Speakers
Credits
Materials
1 CLE Credit – Approval ID: CO ID - 849637 

This course has been accredited for CLE credit in Colorado. CLE credit hours shown are for Colorado only. A CLE course number for Colorado will be provided to attendees on their certificates of attendance once a course has been completed. New Mexico attorneys who complete a course must notify us (cle@rmmlf.org) because we are required to report credits for you. If this course has been approved for RPL/CPL credit with the American Association of Professional Landmen (AAPL), the credits will be listed below in a separate section for AAPL. If applicable, Component Codes for AAPL recertification will also be provided. Please contact RMMLF if you need independent verification by the provider of your attendance or participation for CLE purposes. Except as provided above, RMMLF generally does not apply for accreditation from any other MCLE/CPD organizations for its online legal education program. Upon completion of a program a certificate of attendance will be issued to all attendees. Except as provided above, attendees must verify with their respective state bars and CPD organizations and their specific rules as to whether or not the certificate of attendance will be recognized by that body for MCLE/CPD purposes, and the number of CLE/CPD credits that may be available. The live presentation of the on-demand program has been accredited in most mandatory states as part of a larger course, but such accreditation does not assure recognition of the on-demand program.

If available, this course will include materials (PowerPoints presentations and scholarly papers) authored by the speaker or speakers.